IDS-C and IDS-SR: Psychometric properties in depressed in-patients
Abstract
Sixty-eight depressed in-patients were assessed at admission (DO), and after 5 days (D5), ten days (D10) and 28 days (D28) of antidepressant treatment, with the Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician (IDS-C) and the Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (IDS-SR) (Rush et al., 1986), the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) and the depression factor of the Symptom Check List (SCL-90R) (Derogatis, 1977), in order to assess IDS-C and IDS-SR psychometric properties in depressed in-patients and to compare IDS-C to MADRS and IDS-SR to the SCL-90R depression factor. Most of the IDS-C and IDS-SR items were significantly correlated to the final score and the Cronbach alpha coefficients were high (0.75 for the IDS-C and 0.79 for the IDS-SR). Principal Component Analyses (PCA) showed three factors for both IDS-C and IDS-SR: 'depression', 'anxiety/arousal' and 'sleep/appetite'. These results suggest satisfactory internal consistency of IDS-C and IDS-SR. Concurrent validity of the IDS-C with the MADRS was high (r = 0.81), as well as concurrent validity of the IDS-SR with the SCL-90R depression factor (r = 0.84). Concerning sensitivity to change, the four scales were able to discriminate between different levels of severity of depression. Moreover, considering paired t-tests on score changes, IDS-C sensitivity to change may be higher than MADRS sensitivity to change, this phenomenon being related to the number of items…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report has Cronbach alpha=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high).
“Cronbach α=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high) [118]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Corruble, E., Legrand, J. M., Duret, C., Charles, G., & Guelfi, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Corruble, E
- Venue
- Journal of Affective Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 95-101
- ISSN
- 0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074819224
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- psychometric properties, concurrent validity, sensitivity to change, internal consistency, antidepressant response, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review