Cited by 89Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingTreatment of Major Depression

IDS-C and IDS-SR: Psychometric properties in depressed in-patients

Corruble, E, Legrand, J.M, Duret, C, Charles, G, Guelfi, J.D·1999·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Sixty-eight depressed in-patients were assessed at admission (DO), and after 5 days (D5), ten days (D10) and 28 days (D28) of antidepressant treatment, with the Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician (IDS-C) and the Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Rated (IDS-SR) (Rush et al., 1986), the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) and the depression factor of the Symptom Check List (SCL-90R) (Derogatis, 1977), in order to assess IDS-C and IDS-SR psychometric properties in depressed in-patients and to compare IDS-C to MADRS and IDS-SR to the SCL-90R depression factor. Most of the IDS-C and IDS-SR items were significantly correlated to the final score and the Cronbach alpha coefficients were high (0.75 for the IDS-C and 0.79 for the IDS-SR). Principal Component Analyses (PCA) showed three factors for both IDS-C and IDS-SR: 'depression', 'anxiety/arousal' and 'sleep/appetite'. These results suggest satisfactory internal consistency of IDS-C and IDS-SR. Concurrent validity of the IDS-C with the MADRS was high (r = 0.81), as well as concurrent validity of the IDS-SR with the SCL-90R depression factor (r = 0.84). Concerning sensitivity to change, the four scales were able to discriminate between different levels of severity of depression. Moreover, considering paired t-tests on score changes, IDS-C sensitivity to change may be higher than MADRS sensitivity to change, this phenomenon being related to the number of items…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00055-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 89

Authors
Corruble, E., Legrand, J. M., Duret, C., Charles, G., & Guelfi, J. D.
Affiliations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Corruble, E
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
56
Issue
2-3
Pages
95-101
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074819224
Cited by
89
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
psychometric properties, concurrent validity, sensitivity to change, internal consistency, antidepressant response, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review