The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cation–π interactions in ligand recognition and catalysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystal structure of isopentenyl diphosphate:dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase
Durbecq, V., Sainz, G., Oudjama, Y., Clantin, B., Bompard‐Gilles, C., Tricot, C., Caillet, J., Stalon, V., Droogmans, L., & Villeret, V. (2001) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/20.7.1530 · Cited by 90
Cited by
Force Fields for Protein Simulations
Ponder, J. W., & Case, D. A. (2003) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x · Cited by 1,903
Schug, K. A., & Lindner, W. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040603j · Cited by 579
The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery
Borhani, D. W., & Shaw, D. E. (2012) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9517-y · Cited by 313
“These interac-tions—driven by electric quadrupole moments and polarization effects—are now recognized to be quite important to both protein structure (e.g., arginine–tryptophan ladders) and protein function, for instance, in a wide variety of protein–ligand interactions [65].”
BackgroundEngineering Hydrogel Adhesion for Biomedical Applications via Chemical Design of the Junction
Bovone, G., Dudaryeva, O. Y., Marco-Dufort, B., & Tibbitt, M. W. (2021) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01677 · Cited by 298
Choi, J.-M., Hutson, A. M., Estes, M. K., & Prasad, B. V. V. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803275105 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharias, N.
- Venue
- Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 281-287
- ISSN
- 0165-6147 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086759672
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
