Cited by 374Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Rho proteins, mental retardation and the cellular basis of cognition

Ramakers, Ger J.A.·2002·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

For several decades, it has been known that mental retardation (MR) is associated with abnormalities in dendrites and dendritic spines. The recent cloning of seven genes that cause nonspecific MR when mutated provides important insights in the cellular mechanisms that result in the dendritic abnormalities associated with MR. Three of the encoded proteins, oligophrenin 1, PAK3 and alpha PIX, interact directly with Rho GTPases. Rho GTPases are key signaling proteins that integrate extracellular and intracellular signals to orchestrate coordinated changes in the actin cytoskeleton essential for directed neurite outgrowth and the regulation of synaptic connectivity. Although many details of the cell biology of Rho signaling in the CNS are still unclear, a picture is unfolding showing how mutations that alter Rho signaling result in abnormal neuronal connectivity and deficient cognitive functioning in humans. Conversely, these findings illuminate the cellular mechanisms underlying normal cognitive function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02118-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Downstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology and synaptic strength.

    “Downstream of CaMKII, Ras and Rho GTPases are important for regulating spine morphology (Ramakers, 2002; Saneyoshi et al., 2010) and synaptic strength (Zhu et al., 2002; Patterson et al., 2010).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 92 · Cited by 374

Authors
Ramakers, G. J. A.
Corresponding author
Ramakers, Ger J.A.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
191-199
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105280248
Cited by
374
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2002-08-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Rho GTPases, intellectual disability, OPHN1, PAK3, dendritic spines, dendritic abnormalities, actin cytoskeleton, neurite outgrowth, synaptic connectivity, cognitive function, Rho GTPase signaling, neuronal connectivity
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Brain, Cell Differentiation, Cognition, Dendrites, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Nervous System Malformations, Neural Pathways, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, rho GTP-Binding Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review