Excitable dendrites and spines: earlier theoretical insights elucidate recent direct observations
Abstract
Important advances in experimental methods have made it possible to measure the electrical events in dendrites directly and to record optically from dendritic spines. These new techniques allow us to focus on the input region of the neuron and highlight the excitable properties of the dendritic membrane. Interestingly, some of the recent experimental findings were anticipated by earlier theoretical research, for example, the observation that some spines possess excitable channels that might generate local all-or-none events. Computer models were used previously to explore the conditions for initiating an action potential at the dendritic tree, in particular, at the spine head, and for active propagation between excitable spines and excitable dendritic arbors. The consequences for synaptic amplification, for the extent of active spread in the tree and for non-linear discriminations between different patterns of synaptic inputs were also considered. Here we review the biophysical insights gained from the theory and demonstrate how these elucidate the recent experimental results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dendritic spines may serve as electrical compartments.
“In addition to inducing compartmentalization of biochemical signals and receptors, it has been suggested that dendritic spines may also serve as electrical compartments (Segev and Rall, 1998; Yuste, 2013).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Segev and Rall, 1998
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 86 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Segev, I., & Rall, W.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Segev, Idan
- Venue
- Trends in Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 453-460
- ISSN
- 0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028055236
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Keywords
- dendritic excitability, dendritic spines, dendritic action potentials, dendritic membrane, pattern discrimination, dendritic trees
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dendrites, Ion Channels, Models, Neurological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review