Cited by 20Soil and Environmental StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Micromorphology of Tree Subsoil Hollows: Their Significance to Soil Science and Archaeology

Macphail, R.I., Goldberg, P.·1990·Developments in Soil Science

Abstract

Tree throw is thought to cause subsoil features and the turbation of the original soil horizonation. Ironically, there are only few micromorphological…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-2481(08)70357-x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Macphail, R. I., & Goldberg, P.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Developments in Soil Science
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1990
Pages
425-429
ISSN
0166-2481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W36829393
Cited by
19
References
8
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developments in psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
tree throws, tree cavities, soil micromorphology, soil horizons, burned soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review