Cited by 52Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Nucleus accumbens, entorhinal cortex and latent inhibition: A neural network model

Schmajuk, Nestor A, Cox, Landon, Gray, Jeffrey A·2001·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

A neural network model of classical conditioning (Schmajuk, Lam, and Gray, J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process, 22, 1996, 321-349) is applied to the description of the neural substrates of latent inhibition. Experimental data suggest that latent inhibition might be controlled by a circuit that involves the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex, the nucleus accumbens, and the mesolimbic dopaminergic projection from the ventral tegmental area to the accumbens. By mapping different nodes and connections in the model onto this brain circuit, computer simulations demonstrate that, in most cases, the model provides a good quantitative description of: (1) the impairment of latent inhibition by lesions of the shell of the nucleus accumbens; (2) the restoration of latent inhibition by haloperidol following lesions of the shell; (3) the preservation of latent inhibition by lesions of the core of the nucleus accumbens; (4) the facilitation of latent inhibition by combined shell core lesions and by core lesions with extended conditioning; (5) the impairment of latent inhibition following lesions of the entorhinal cortex or the hippocampus; and (6) the restoration of latent inhibition by haloperidol following lesions of the entorhinal cortex and ventral subiculum. In addition, the model is able to describe neural activity in the nucleus accumbens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00319-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmajuk, N. A., Cox, L., & Gray, J. A.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
123-141
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072278279
Cited by
52
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
latent inhibition, nucleus accumbens, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, ventral tegmental area, mesolimbic dopamine system, classical conditioning, neural network model, nucleus accumbens shell, nucleus accumbens core, haloperidol, ventral subiculum, lesion effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Dopamine, Environment, Globus Pallidus, Haloperidol, Nucleus Accumbens, Reflex, Startle, Thalamus, Neural Networks, Computer, Dopamine Agonists, Dopamine Antagonists, Entorhinal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review