Cited by 56Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Effects of gonadal hormones and persistent pain on non-spatial working memory in male and female rats

Ceccarelli, Ilaria, Scaramuzzino, Andrea, Aloisi, Anna Maria·2001·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

There are indications of a modulatory role carried out by gonadal hormones and pain in cognitive functions. We have examined this issue in male and female rats by assessing the impact of gonadectomy and persistent pain on the object recognition test. Intact and gonadectomized male and female rats were exposed to an open field (15 min) in which three objects were placed (Trial 1); the same test was repeated 2 h later (Trial 2), after the replacement of a "familiar" object with a novel one. Three days later (Day 2), the same procedure was repeated (Trial 3 and 4 with 2 h in between) but half of the animals were exposed to formalin-injection immediately before Trial 3. The latency, frequency and duration of approaching the three objects were recorded in each trial and compared by sex, gonadectomy and formalin treatment. The results showed that gonadectomized males and females had lower levels of approach to all objects and less locomotor/exploratory activity than intact animals in all experimental trials; their behaviour was not affected by repetition of the test or by pain. On Day 1, intact males showed a higher level of approach to the novel object than females. In intact males, the 2 h delay between the first and second trial failed to induce any significant modification of exploration of the novel object with respect to the familiar one, while in intact females the novel object was approached much less than the familiar one. Similarly on Day 2, the novel object was approache…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00195-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ceccarelli et al. reported that male rats show more persistence investigating the objects compared to female rats.

    “In line with our results, Ceccarelli et al. [33], reported that male rats show more persistence investigating the objects compared to female rats.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ceccarelli, I., Scaramuzzino, A., & Aloisi, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Siena (IT)
Corresponding author
Aloisi, Anna Maria
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
65-76
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023787112
Cited by
56
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Siena
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
gonadal hormones, chronic pain, object recognition memory, gonadectomy, sex differences, formalin-induced pain, novel object recognition, exploratory behavior, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corticosterone, Feces, Female, Form Perception, Formaldehyde, Male, Orchiectomy, Ovariectomy, Pain, Pain Measurement, Space Perception, Vagina, Rats, Wistar, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review