The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of 129S2/SvHsd and C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice on a test battery assessing sensorimotor, affective and cognitive behaviours: implications for the study of genetically modified mice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype?
Gerlai, R. (1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)20020-7 · Cited by 881
Shepherd, J. K., Grewal, S. S., Fletcher, A., Bill, D. J., & Dourish, C. T. (1994) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244871 · Cited by 739
Animal models of ‘anxiety’: Where next?
Rodgers, R. J. (1997) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/00008877-199711000-00003 · Cited by 437 · cited 1×
“This increased activity was marked and significant for closed arm entries, which most closely reflect a general activity factor [35].”
BackgroundBannerman, D. M., Yee, B. K., Good, M. A., Heupel, M. J., Iversen, S. D., & Rawlins, J. N. P. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.6.1170 · Cited by 397
Owen, E. H., Logue, S. F., Rasmussen, D. L., & Wehner, J. M. (1997) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00165-6 · Cited by 347
Richmond, M. A., Yee, B. K., Pouzet, B., Veenman, L., Rawlins, J. N. P., Feldon, J., & Bannerman, D. M. (1999) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037//0735-7044.113.6.1189 · Cited by 347
Self-citationAn ethological analysis of open-field behavior in rats and mice
Suarez, S. D., & Gallup, G. G. (1981) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90013-8 · Cited by 99 · cited 1×
“Conceivably, some mice with low anxiety levels might venture to the extremes of the apparatus, particularly if escape behaviour strongly influences behaviour [41], and, having found that escape was not possible, then retreat to a place with minimal risk of predation, such as a closed arm.”
Background
Cited by
Measuring Motor Coordination in Mice
Deacon, R. M. J. (2013) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/2609 · Cited by 484
Kowal, C., DeGiorgio, L. A., Nakaoka, T., Hetherington, H., Huerta, P. T., Diamond, B., & Volpe, B. T. (2004) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.011 · Cited by 405
Habituation in rodents: a review of behavior, neurobiology, and genetics
LEUSSIS, M., & BOLIVAR, V (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.006 · Cited by 330
Holmes, A., Li, Q., Murphy, D. L., Gold, E., & Crawley, J. N. (2003) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1046/j.1601-1848.2003.00050.x · Cited by 313
Measuring the Strength of Mice
Deacon, R. M. J. (2013) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/2610 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Contet, C.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09-28
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-46
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053220357
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of 129S2/SvHsd and C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice on a test battery assessing sensorimotor, affective and cognitive behaviours: implications for the study of genetically modified mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00231-5
- The paper
- Contet, C. (2001). A comparison of 129S2/SvHsd and C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice on a test battery assessing sensorimotor, affective and cognitive behaviours: implications for the study of genetically modified mice. Behavioural Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00231-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
