Cited by 40Stress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Blockade of alpha1 adrenoreceptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus prevents enhanced conditioned fear and impaired escape performance following uncontrollable stressor exposure in rats

Grahn, Ruth E, Hammack, S.E, Will, M.J, O'Connor, K.A, Deak, T, Sparks, P.D, Watkins, L.R, Maier, S.F·2002·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the effect of exposure to uncontrollable stressors on conditioned fear responding and escape behavior in rats is dependent on serotonergic neural activity in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN). The role that norepinephrine released in the DRN plays in producing the behavioral consequences of exposure to inescapable tail shock in rats was investigated in the present study. The selective alpha1 adrenoreceptor antagonist benoxathian was injected into the DRN before exposure to inescapable tail shock or before behavioral testing conducted 24 h later. Benoxathian prevented the impairment of escape responding produced by inescapable shock, but did not reverse this effect when given before testing. The enhancement of conditioned fear produced by prior inescapable shock was attenuated by benoxathian administered before inescapable shock or before behavioral testing. These results support the view that noradrenergic input to the DRN is necessary to produce the behavioral effects of inescapable tail shock.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00061-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DRN does not receive greater excitatory input during inescapable shock than during escapable shock.

    “So, the conclusion is that the dorsal raphe nucleus does not receive any heightened excitation from inescapable shock relative to escapable shock.”

    From Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. (2016) · cites this paper as Grahn et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grahn, R. E., Hammack, S. E., Will, M. J., O'Connor, K. A., Deak, T., Sparks, P. D., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Grahn, Ruth E
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
134
Issue
1-2
Pages
387-392
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111153692
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-00314, MH 50479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
alpha1-adrenoceptors, dorsal raphe nucleus, noradrenergic input, serotonergic system, fear conditioning, escape behavior, uncontrollable stress, norepinephrine, stress response
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Epinephrine, Escape Reaction, Fear, Helplessness, Learned, Male, Microinjections, Norepinephrine, Oxathiins, Raphe Nuclei, Restraint, Physical, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review