The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition and amphetamine-induced activity
Abstract
Latent inhibition (LI) consists of retardation in conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its prior non-reinforced pre-exposure. In view of findings that LI is disrupted in acute schizophrenic patients and evidence from animal experiments pointing to the involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system in this phenomenon, the present study investigated the effects of electrolytic lesions to the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens on LI in rats (Expt. 1). LI was indexed by the amount of suppression of drinking in the presence of a tone that was either pre-exposed or not prior to its pairing with reinforcement (a foot shock). Expt.2 tested the effects of the DA antagonist, haloperidol, on LI in shell- and core-lesioned animals. Expt. 3 tested the effects of shell and core lesions on spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotion. In Expt. 1, LI, i.e., lower suppression of drinking in the pre-exposed as compared to the non-pre-exposed animals, was obtained in the sham-operated condition. Core and shell lesions produced distinct effects on LI. Animals with core lesions developed LI, but exhibited an overall lower suppression of drinking in comparison to the sham-operated animals. In contrast, shell lesions led to a disappearance of LI. Expt. 2 replicated the differential effects of shell and core lesions on LI, although in this experiment, core lesion did not attenuate suppression of drinking. Haloperidol prevented shell-induced abolition of LI. In Exp…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lesions to the nucleus accumbens can produce perseverative responding, impair reversal learning, and reduce behavioural switching [69–71].”
Citations
Cites
The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Palkovits, M. (1983) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/0143-4179(83)90049-5 · Cited by 28,959
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 28,585
Implications of Normal Brain Development for the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia
Weinberger, D. R. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800190080012 · Cited by 3,724
A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
Mackintosh, N. J. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0076778 · Cited by 2,733
Kelly, P. H., Seviour, P. W., & Iversen, S. D. (1975) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90233-4 · Cited by 1,740
The neuropsychology of schizophrenia
Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R., & Smith, A. D. (1991) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00065055 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationConditioning and Associative Learning
Hill, W. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422540 · Cited by 1,304
Krettek, J. E., & Price, J. L. (1978) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901780204 · Cited by 1,293
Nuechterlein, K. H., & Dawson, M. E. (1984) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/10.2.160 · Cited by 1,142
On the significance of subterritories in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum
Zahm, D. S., & Brog, J. S. (1992) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(92)90202-d · Cited by 1,040
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Aylward, 1989, The nucleus accumbens as a site of interaction between limbic somatostatin and cholecystokinin, and mesolimbic dopamine, Behav. Pharmacol., S1.204
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ikemoto, S., & Panksepp, J. (1999) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00023-5 · Cited by 1,450
Alcaro, A., Huber, R., & Panksepp, J. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.014 · Cited by 661
Towards an immuno-precipitated neurodevelopmental animal model of schizophrenia
Meyer, U., Feldon, J., Schedlowski, M., & Yee, B. K. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.10.012 · Cited by 494
Self-citationZahm, D. S. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00065-2 · Cited by 487
Weiner, I. (2003) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-002-1313-x · Cited by 398
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiner, I., Gal, G., Rawlins, J. N. P., & Feldon, J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Weiner, I.
- ORCID
- Gal, G.
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 123-133
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056093189
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tel Aviv University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- latent inhibition, nucleus accumbens shell, nucleus accumbens core, mesolimbic dopamine system, dopamine antagonism, haloperidol, amphetamine-induced locomotion, schizophrenia, electrolytic lesions, pre-exposure
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Drinking, Emotions, Haloperidol, Handling, Psychological, Male, Motor Activity, Nucleus Accumbens, Stimulation, Chemical, Rats, Wistar, Dopamine Antagonists, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review