Cited by 240Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The switching model of latent inhibition: an update of neural substrates

Weiner, I., Feldon, J.·1997·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Organisms exposed to a stimulus which has no significant consequences, show subsequently latent inhibition (LI), namely, retarded conditioning to this stimulus. LI is considered to index the capacity to ignore irrelevant stimuli and its disruption has recently received increasing interest as an animal model of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Initial studies indicated that LI is disrupted by systemic or intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine and hippocampal lesions, and potentiated by systemic administration of neuroleptics. On the basis of these findings, the switching model of LI proposed that LI depends on the subicular input to the nucleus accumbens (NAC). Subsequent studies supported and refined this proposition. Lesion studies show that LI is indeed disrupted by severing the subicular input to the NAC, and further implicate the entorhinal/ventral subicular portion of this pathway projecting to the shell subterritory of the NAC. There is a functional dissociation between the shell and core subterritories of the NAC, with lesions of the former but not of the latter disrupting LI. This suggests that the shell is necessary for the expression and the core for the disruption of LI. The involvement of the NAC has been also demonstrated by findings that LI is disrupted by intra-accumbens injection of amphetamine and potentiated by DA depletion or blockade in this structure. Disruption and potentiation of LI by systemic administration of amphetamine and neuroleptics, resp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)02314-0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiner, I., & Feldon, J.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Weiner, I.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
11-25
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006749296
Cited by
240
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
latent inhibition, switching model, nucleus accumbens, subiculum, entorhinal cortex, ventral subiculum, nucleus accumbens shell, nucleus accumbens core, amphetamine, dopamine depletion, dopamine receptor blockade, antipsychotic drugs, hippocampal lesions, animal models of schizophrenia, attentional filtering, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Humans, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reflex, Startle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review