The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We study an opinion dynamics model in which agents reach compromise via pairwise interactions. When the opinions of two agents are sufficiently close, they both acquire the average of their initial opinions; otherwise, they do not interact. Generically, the system reaches a steady state with a finite number of isolated, non-interacting opinion clusters (“parties”). As the initial opinion range increases, the number of such parties undergoes a periodic sequence of bifurcations. Both major and minor parties emerge, and these are organized in alternating pattern. This behavior is illuminated by considering discrete opinion states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization
Axelrod, R. (1997) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002797041002001 · Cited by 1,918
Cited by
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
LORENZ, J. (2007) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s0129183107011789 · Cited by 561
Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks
Jia, P., MirTabatabaei, A., Friedkin, N. E., & Bullo, F. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/130913250 · Cited by 318
Mass media and repulsive interactions in continuous-opinion dynamics
Vaz Martins, T., Pineda, M., & Toral, R. (2010) · EPL (Europhysics Letters) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/91/48003 · Cited by 77
Robust Clustering in Generalized Bounded Confidence Models
Kurahashi-Nakamura, T., Mäs, M., & Lorenz, J. (2016) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.3220 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben-Naim, E., Krapivsky, P. L., & Redner, S.
- Venue
- Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 190-204
- ISSN
- 0167-2789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982133615
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-2789(03)00171-4
- The paper
- Ben-Naim, E., Krapivsky, P. L., & Redner, S. (2003). Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(03)00171-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
