The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information theory of quantum entanglement and measurement
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We present a quantum information theory that allows for a consistent description of entanglement. It parallels classical (Shannon) information theory but is based entirely on density matrices rather than probability distributions for the description of quantum ensembles. We find that quantum (von Neumann) conditional entropies can be negative for entangled systems, which leads to a violation of entropic Bell inequalities. Quantum inseparability can be related, in this theory, to the appearance of “unclassical” eigenvalues in the spectrum of a conditional “amplitude” matrix that underlies the quantum conditional entropy. Such a unified information-theoretic description of classical correlation and quantum entanglement clarifies the link between them: the latter can be viewed as “super-correlation” which can induce classical correlation when considering a tripartite or larger system. Furthermore, the characterization of entanglment with negative conditional entropies paves the way to a natural information-theoretic description of the measurement process. This model, while unitary and causal, implies the well-known probabilistic results of conventional quantum mechanics. It also results in a simple interpretation of the Levitin-Kholevo theorem limiting the accessible information in a quantum measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 2×
“For example, it has been shown that an arbitrary quantum state cannot be cloned [27] precisely because of the entanglement between the system Q and the ancilla A.”
BackgroundIrreversibility and heat generation in the computing process
Landauer, R. (1961) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.53.0183 · Cited by 4,980
The thermodynamics of computation—a review
Bennett, C. H. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02084158 · Cited by 2,006
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5234.255 · Cited by 1,651
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe
(1989) · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4 · Cited by 1,632
Quantum computation and Shor's factoring algorithm
Ekert, A., & Jozsa, R. (1996) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.733 · Cited by 1,354
A New Proof of the Quantum Noiseless Coding Theorem
Jozsa, R., & Schumacher, B. (1994) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500349414552191 · Cited by 304
Lloyd, S. (1995) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1095-140 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits
Wootters, W. K. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 · Cited by 8,290
Biochemistry and Theory of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer
Migliore, A., Polizzi, N. F., Therien, M. J., & Beratan, D. N. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4006654 · Cited by 520
“Squashed entanglement”: An additive entanglement measure
Christandl, M., & Winter, A. (2004) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1643788 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerf, N. J., & Adami, C.
- Venue
- Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 62-81
- ISSN
- 0167-2789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981940647
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information theory of quantum entanglement and measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00045-1
- The paper
- Cerf, N. J., & Adami, C. (1998). Information theory of quantum entanglement and measurement. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00045-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.