CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 426Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotic Use and ResistanceAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Avoparcin used as a growth promoter is associated with the occurrence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium on Danish poultry and pig farms

Bager, F, Madsen, M, Christensen, J, Aarestrup, F.M·1997·Preventive Veterinary Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We determined the association between the use of the glycopeptide antibiotic avoparcin as a growth promoter and the occurrence of Enterococcus faecium (VREF) with high-level resistance to vancomycin (MIC > or = 64 micrograms ml-1) on poultry and pig farms. The investigations were conducted as retrospective cohort studies, where groups of farms exposed or not exposed to avoparcin between September 1994 and April 1995 were compared. In poultry, the association between the use of avoparcin and the occurrence of VREF was confounded by the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and the adjusted relative risk was 2.9 (1.4-5.9). In pigs, the association had a similar magnitude with a non-adjusted relative risk of 3.3 (0.9-12.3). The similar findings in the two studies provide evidence in favour of a causal association between the use of avoparcin and the occurrence of VREF on farms, and suggest that food animals constitute a potential reservoir of infection for VREF in humans.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1995, EID, 1, 66

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 426

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bager, F., Madsen, M., Christensen, J., & Aarestrup, F. M.
Affiliations
Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Bager, F
ORCID
Venue
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-07
Volume
31
Issue
1-2
Pages
95-112
ISSN
0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01119-1
OpenAlex
W2040630478
Cited by
426
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
avoparcin, growth promoters, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, vancomycin resistance, poultry farms, pig farms, antibiotic use, broad-spectrum antibiotics, zoonotic reservoirs, food-producing animals, antimicrobial resistance
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antibodies, Bacterial, Chickens, Denmark, Disease Susceptibility, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Female, Glycopeptides, Growth Substances, Male, Poultry, Poultry Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms, Swine, Swine Diseases, Vancomycin, Cohort Studies, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Enterococcus faecium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review