CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Advanced Radiotherapy TechniquesProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PO-1275: Opportunities and challenges in the adoption and implementation of MR-Linac for prostate cancer

Hehakaya, C., Van der Voort van Zyp, J., Lagendijk, J., Grobbee, D., Verkooijen, H., Ellen, M.·2020·Radiotherapy and Oncology
DOI 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01293-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01293-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hehakaya, C., Van der Voort van Zyp, J., Lagendijk, J., Grobbee, D., Verkooijen, H., & Ellen, M.
ORCID
Venue
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
152
Pages
S672
ISSN
0167-8140 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0167-8140(21)01293-7
OpenAlex
W3126193297
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Radiotherapy and Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
MR-Linac, prostate cancer, radiotherapy, treatment planning, implementation barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review