Cited by 250Odor and Emission Control TechnologiesAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control

Zhu, Jun·2000·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Generation of odors is a complex process that involves many bacterial species, producing an extensive array of volatile organic compounds under different manure storage systems currently used. A lack of understanding of the basic microbiology in manure leads to a poor odor prevention and control from animal wastes. This review covers pertinent available information about the indigenous bacterial genera in swine manure and their potentials of producing odorous volatile compounds. It addresses not only the odorous compounds in swine manure but also the inherent relations between the bacterial species and the related compounds. It also discusses several odor control techniques that have been developed based on microbial activities and the limitations with these techniques. Two bacterial genera, Eubacterium and Clostridium, are most likely the major contributors to odorous volatile fatty acids. It appears that anaerobic lagoons may not be an appropriate choice for treating swine manure for odor control due to the reduced methonogenic activities resulted from the low temperatures in lagoon liquid. Also, it seems questionable that the microbial-based manure additives will work, without aeration, in a real storage system for the purpose of odor control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00116-4

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The success in application of microorganism inoculums, earthworms and black soldier fly larvae is strongly linked to the need for having the right organism biomass and optimization of the essential environmental factors as the environment should not deviate tremendously from the optimal growth range of the strain biomass in the inoculum.

    “However, the success in their application is strongly linked to the need for having the right organism biomass and optimization of the essential environmental factors as the environment should not deviate tremendously from the optimal growth range of the strain biomass in the inoculum [96, 97].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Jun
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
93-106
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152771061
Cited by
250
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
pig manure, odor control, volatile organic compounds, bacterial genera, Eubacterium, Clostridium, volatile fatty acids, anaerobic lagoons, methanogenic activity, aeration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review