Cited by 116Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesNoise Effects and ManagementHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Noise in dog kennelling: is barking a welfare problem for dogs?

Sales, G., Hubrecht, R., Peyvandi, A., Milligan, S., Shield, B.·1997·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0168-1591(96)01132-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sales, G., Hubrecht, R., Peyvandi, A., Milligan, S., & Shield, B.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (GB)
  • London South Bank University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sales, G.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
52
Issue
3-4
Pages
321-329
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996329857
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
barking, noise level, dog welfare, diurnal variation, sound pressure level, dog husbandry, noise guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review