Comparative evaluation of compact photobioreactors for large-scale monoculture of microalgae
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gas bubbles in gas-sparged photobioreactors can scatter light.
“In principle, gas bubbles in gas-sparged photobioreactors can scatter light [82-84].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [83]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 352
- Authors
- Sánchez Mirón, A., Contreras Gómez, A., Garcı́a Camacho, F., Molina Grima, E., & Chisti, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 249-270
- ISSN
- 0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001522627
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Keywords
- Phaeodactylum tricornutum, gas-liquid mass transfer, surface-to-volume ratio, row spacing, outdoor microalgae cultivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
