The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil
Open accessAbstract
Biological soil thin-sections and a combination of image analysis and geostatistical tools were used to conduct a detailed investigation into the distribution of bacteria in soil and their relationship with pores. The presence of spatial patterns in the distribution of bacteria was demonstrated at the microscale, with ranges of spatial autocorrelation of 1 mm and below. Bacterial density gradients were found within bacterial patches in topsoil samples and also in one subsoil sample. Bacterial density patches displayed a mosaic of high and low values in the remaining subsoil samples. Anisotropy was detected in the spatial structure of pores, but was not detected in relation to the distribution of bacteria. No marked trend as a function of distance to the nearest pore was observed in bacterial density values in the topsoil, but in the subsoil bacterial density was greatest close to pores and decreased thereafter. Bacterial aggregation was greatest in the cropped topsoil, though no consistent trends were found in the degree of bacterial aggregation as a function of distance to the nearest pore. The implications of the results presented for modelling and predicting bacterial activity in soil are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon, nitrogen and microbial gradients induced by plant residues decomposing in soil
Gaillard, V., Chenu, C., Recous, S., & Richard, G. (1999) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00266.x · Cited by 167
Cited by
Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: Concept & review
Kuzyakov, Y., & Blagodatskaya, E. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025 · Cited by 1,872
Spatial Ecology of Bacteria at the Microscale in Soil
Raynaud, X., & Nunan, N. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087217 · Cited by 401
Self-citationZinc toxicity stimulates microbial production of extracellular polymers in a copiotrophic acid soil
Redmile-Gordon, M., & Chen, L. (2017) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.004 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W., & Ritz, K.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-215
- ISSN
- 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6941
- OpenAlex
- W2153564965
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00027-8
- The paper
- Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W., & Ritz, K. (2003). Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00027-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.