The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolution in black and white: genetic control of pigment patterns in Drosophila
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form
Carroll, S. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030245 · Cited by 882
Self-citationMiller, C. T., Beleza, S., Pollen, A. A., Schluter, D., Kittles, R. A., Shriver, M. D., & Kingsley, D. M. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.055 · Cited by 388
Stable structural color patterns displayed on transparent insect wings
Shevtsova, E., Hansson, C., Janzen, D. H., & Kjærandsen, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1017393108 · Cited by 274
The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study
Cook, L. M., & Saccheri, I. J. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.92 · Cited by 228
Industrial Melanism in British Peppered Moths Has a Singular and Recent Mutational Origin
van’t Hof, A. E., Edmonds, N., Dalíková, M., Marec, F., & Saccheri, I. J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203043 · Cited by 228
van't Hof, A. E., & Saccheri, I. J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010889 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittkopp, P. J., Carroll, S. B., & Kopp, A.
- Venue
- Trends in Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 495-504
- ISSN
- 0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028546685
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.