Stable structural color patterns displayed on transparent insect wings
Open accessAbstract
Color patterns play central roles in the behavior of insects, and are important traits for taxonomic studies. Here we report striking and stable structural color patterns—wing interference patterns (WIPs)—in the transparent wings of small Hymenoptera and Diptera, patterns that have been largely overlooked by biologists. These extremely thin wings reflect vivid color patterns caused by thin film interference. The visibility of these patterns is affected by the way the insects display their wings against various backgrounds with different light properties. The specific color sequence displayed lacks pure red and matches the color vision of most insects, strongly suggesting that the biological significance of WIPs lies in visual signaling. Taxon-specific color patterns are formed by uneven membrane thickness, pigmentation, venation, and hair placement. The optically refracted pattern is also stabilized by microstructures of the wing such as membrane corrugations and spherical cell structures that reinforce the pattern and make it essentially noniridescent over a large range of light incidences. WIPs can be applied to map the micromorphology of wings through direct observation and are useful in several fields of biology. We demonstrate their usefulness as identification patterns to solve cases of cryptic species complexes in tiny parasitic wasps, and indicate their potentials for research on the genetic control of wing development through direct links between the transregulatory wing landscape and interference patterns we observe in Drosophila model species. Some species display sexually dimorphic WIPs, suggesting sexual selection as one of the driving forces for their evolution.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparent wings of insects exhibit iridescent colors in reflection yet are colorless in transmission.
“A typical example is the transparent wings of insects (10), which exhibit iridescent colors in reflection yet are colorless in transmission.”
From Light diffraction by sarcomeres produces iridescence in transmission in the transparent ghost catfish (2023) · cites this paper as [10]
The paper reports colored reflections from transparent insect wings, but explicitly describes their patterns as stable and essentially noniridescent (p. 1). The Discussion (p. 3) says it finds almost no iridescence except under narrowly directed light, contrary to the citing sentence’s unqualified description of iridescent colors in reflection. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Repeated morphological evolution through cis-regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene
Prud'homme, B., Gompel, N., Rokas, A., Kassner, V. A., Williams, T. M., Yeh, S.-D., True, J. R., & Carroll, S. B. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04597 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Fly photoreceptors demonstrate energy-information trade-offs in neural coding
Niven, J. E., Anderson, J. C., & Laughlin, S. B. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050116 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tanner, D. B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316672778 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Butterworth, N. J., White, T. E., Byrne, P. G., & Wallman, J. F. (2021) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13759 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Fan, X., Zheng, X., An, T., Li, X., Leung, N., Zhu, B., Sui, T., Shi, N., Fan, T., & Zhao, Q. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2219300120 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shevtsova, E., Hansson, C., Janzen, D. H., & Kjærandsen, J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shevtsova, Ekaterina
- Hansson, Christer
- Janzen, Daniel H.
- Kjærandsen, Jostein
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-01-03
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 668-673
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3021046
- OpenAlex
- W2125211114
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
- Keywords
- structural color, wing interference patterns, thin film interference, Hymenoptera, Diptera, parasitoid wasps, cryptic species complex, species identification, wing venation, sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, Drosophila
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila, Female, Insecta, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Pigmentation, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Factors, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Wings, Animal, Body Patterning, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review