Cited by 570Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesResearch Data Management Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution

Arnqvist, Göran, Wooster, David·1995·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

The growing number of empirical studies performed in ecology and evolution creates a need for quantitative summaries of research domains to generate higher-order conclusions about general trends and patterns. Recent developments In meta-analysis (the area of statistics that is designed for summarizing and analyzing multiple independent studies) have opened up new and exciting possibilities. Unlike more traditional qualitative and narrative reviews, meta-analysis allows powerful quantitative analyses of the magnitude of effects and has a high degree of objectivity because it is based on a standardized set of statistical procedures. The first pioneering applications in ecology and evolution demonstrate that meta-analysis is both tractable and powerful.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Selden, 1992, Curr Bibliogr Med., 1992/13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 570

Metadata

Authors
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
236-240
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162582079
Cited by
570
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
meta-analysis, ecology, evolution, effect size, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review