The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation genetics: where are we now?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
Phylogeography: the history and formation of species
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5647 · Cited by 4,538
Anderson, E. N. (1977) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2,567
Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology
Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Mace, G. M., & Wayne, R. K. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01876-0 · Cited by 1,985
Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation
Yang, Z., & Bielawski, J. P. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01994-7 · Cited by 1,806
Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome
Reich, D. E., Cargill, M., Bolk, S., Ireland, J., Sabeti, P. C., Richter, D. J., Lavery, T., Kouyoumjian, R., Farhadian, S. F., Ward, R., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35075590 · Cited by 1,774
The neutral theory of molecular evolution
Dover, G. A. (1984) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(84)90064-4 · Cited by 1,369
Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species
Waples, R. S. (1998) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/89.5.438 · Cited by 1,292
Luikart, G., & Cornuet, J.-M. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96388.x · Cited by 1,206
Cornuet, J.-M., Piry, S., Luikart, G., Estoup, A., & Solignac, M. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/153.4.1989 · Cited by 1,199
Cited by
Inbreeding effects in wild populations
Keller, L. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02489-8 · Cited by 3,309
Ten years of AFLP in ecology and evolution: why so few animals?
BENSCH, S., & ÅKESSON, M. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02655.x · Cited by 675
Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments
Bijlsma, R., & Loeschcke, V. (2012) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00214.x · Cited by 345
Does reduced MHC diversity decrease viability of vertebrate populations?
Radwan, J., Biedrzycka, A., & Babik, W. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.026 · Cited by 259
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Markers in Conservation Biology
Ujvari, B., & Belov, K. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12085168 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedrick, P. W.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 629-636
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140468698
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation genetics: where are we now? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02282-0
- The paper
- Hedrick, P. W. (2001). Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02282-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
