CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a new evolutionary synthesis

Carroll, Robert L.·2000·Trends in Ecology & Evolution
DOI 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01743-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

New concepts and information from molecular developmental biology, systematics, geology and the fossil record of all groups of organisms, need to be integrated into an expanded evolutionary synthesis. These fields of study show that large-scale evolutionary phenomena cannot be understood solely on the basis of extrapolation from processes observed at the level of modern populations and species. Patterns and rates of evolution are much more varied than had been conceived by Darwin or the evolutionary synthesis, and physical factors of the earth's history have had a significant, but extremely varied, impact on the evolution of life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01743-7

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greenwood, 1974, The cichlid fishes of Lake Victoria, East Africa, Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool. Suppl., 6, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–132 of 132

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carroll, R. L.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Carroll, Robert L.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
27-32
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01743-7
OpenAlex
W2146283175
Semantic Scholar
3b2d6368b6515c41615540a9130deb30b9aa7641
Cited by
133
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
molecular developmental biology, systematics, fossil record, evolutionary rates, Darwinism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review