CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new approach to the relief of Great Britain

Clayton, Keith, Shamoon, Nadhim·1998·Geomorphology
DOI 10.1016/s0169-555x(98)00038-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-555x(98)00038-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has demonstrated that a single geomorphic index is insufficient to reliably infer relative uplift rates in a vast region because uplift rates can be affected by a variety of conditions, including lithological variation which affects erosional resistance.

    “Previous research has demonstrated that a single geomorphic index is insufficient to reliably infer relative uplift rates in a vast region, such as the one studied here, because uplift rates can be affected by variety of conditions, including lithological variation which affects erosional resistance (Clayton and Shamoon 1998;Bucci and Schoenbohm 2022;Selby 1980;Telbisz et al. 2013).”

    From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Clayton and Shamoon 1998

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Allison, 1990, The form of rock slopes in tropical limestone and their associations with rock mass strength, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 24, 129, 10.1127/zfg/34/1990/129 · DOI
  2. Augustinius, 1991, Rock resistance to erosion, Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, 16, 563, 10.1002/esp.3290160608 · DOI
  3. Barnes, J.W., 1981. Basic Geological Mapping. Geological Society London, Handbook Series 1. Open University Press, 112 pp.
  4. Bell, F.G., 1983. Engineering Properties of Soils and Rocks. Butterworth, London. · DOI
  5. Clayton, 1998, A new approach to the relief of Great Britain: I. The machine-readable database, Geomorphology, 25, 31, 10.1016/S0169-555X(98)00037-3 · DOI
  6. Costa, 1984, The piedmont landscape of Maryland: a new look at an old problem, Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms, 9, 59, 10.1002/esp.3290090107 · DOI
  7. Flint, 1963, Altitude and lithology and the fall zone in Connecticut, J. Geol., 71, 683, 10.1086/626949 · DOI
  8. Gerrard, A.J., 1988. Rocks and Landforms. Unwin Hyman, London, 319 pp. · DOI
  9. Goudie, A., 1990. The Landforms of England and Wales. Blackwell, Oxford, 394 pp.
  10. Mackinder, H.J., 1930. Britain and the British Seas, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 377 pp.
  11. Rahn, 1971, The weathering of tombstones and its relationship to the topography of New England, J. Geol. Educ., 19, 112, 10.5408/0022-1368-XIX.3.112 · DOI
  12. Selby, 1980, A rock mass strength classification for geomorphic purposes with tests from Antarctica and New Zealand, Z. Geomorph. N.F., 24, 31, 10.1127/zfg/24/1984/31 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Selby, M.J., 1987. Rock slopes. In: Anderson, M.G., Richards, K.S. (Eds.), Slope Stability. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 475–504.
  14. Stille, 1920, Über Alter and Art der Phasen variscischer Gebirgsbildung, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl., 2, 218

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clayton, K., & Shamoon, N.
Venue
Geomorphology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-11
Volume
25
Issue
3-4
Pages
155-171
ISSN
0169-555X
DOI
10.1016/s0169-555x(98)00038-5
Cited by
29
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review