Cited by 634Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Managementmelanin and skin pigmentationCancer and Skin Lesions

In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions

Pehamberger, Hubert, Steiner, Andreas, Wolff, Klaus·1987·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

The importance of recognizing early melanoma is generally accepted. Because not all pigmented skin lesions can be diagnosed correctly by their clinical appearance, additional criteria are required for the clinical diagnosis of such lesions. In vivo epiluminescence microscopy provides for a more detailed inspection of the surface of pigmented skin lesions, and, by using the oil immersion technic, which renders the epidermis translucent, opens a new dimension of skin morphology by including the dermoepidermal junction into the macroscopic evaluation of a lesion. In an epiluminescence microscopy study of more than 3000 pigmented skin lesions we have defined morphologic criteria that are not readily apparent to the naked eye but that are detected easily by epiluminescence microscopy and represent relatively reliable markers of benign and malignant pigmented skin lesions. These features include specific patterns, colors, and intensities of pigmentation, as well as the configuration, regularity, and other characteristics of both the margin and the surface of pigmented skin lesions. Pattern analysis of these features permits a distinction between different types of pigmented skin lesions and, in particular, between benign and malignant growth patterns. Epiluminescence microscopy is thus a valuable addition to the diagnostic armamentarium of pigmented skin lesions at a clinical level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0190-9622(87)70239-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma.

    “Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma9–20.”

    From Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pehamberger, H., Steiner, A., & Wolff, K.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Wolff, Klaus
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-10
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
571-583
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151287908
Cited by
634
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
Keywords
pigmented skin lesions, melanoma diagnosis, benign versus malignant differentiation, basement membrane zone, pattern analysis, skin morphology
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Lentigo, Luminescent Measurements, Melanoma, Microscopy, Neoplasms, Vascular Tissue, Nevus, Pigmented, Pigmentation Disorders, Skin Neoplasms, Warts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review