Cited by 76Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesCancer and Skin LesionsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Vascular patterns in basal cell carcinoma

Micantonio, T, Gulia, A, Altobelli, E, Di Cesare, A, Fidanza, R, Riitano, A, Fargnoli, MC, Peris, K·2011·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Background Dermoscopy has been proved to increase the diagnostic accuracy of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Objective To characterize the type and frequency of vascular patterns in superficial and nodular BCCs. Methods We retrospectively analysed the dermoscopic images of 504 histopathologically proven BCCs. Results The most common vascular pattern was represented by arborizing vessels (306/504; 60.7%), which were significantly more frequent in nodular BCCs (nBCCs) compared with superficial BCCs (sBCCs), and in pigmented sBCCs vs. non‐pigmented sBCCs (P < 0.0001). Short fine telangectasias (SFTs) were found in 33.1% (167/504) of cases and were significantly more frequent in sBCCs compared with nBCCs (P < 0.0001). Hairpin vessels were detected in 52/504 (10.3%) BCCs. Minor vascular patterns included glomerular vessels (41/504; 8.1%), dotted (21/504; 4.2%), comma vessels (5/504; 1.0%) and polymorphous pattern (9/504; 1.8%). Conclusions Arborizing vessels are prototypic of nBCCs, whereas SFTs are characteristics of sBCCs. Differential diagnosis with squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma is mandatory when a polymorphous pattern is detected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03734.x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Micantonio, T., Gulia, A., Altobelli, E., Di Cesare, A., Fidanza, R., Riitano, A., Fargnoli, M., & Peris, K.
Affiliations
University of L'Aquila (IT)
Corresponding author
Peris, K
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-06
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
358-361
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W1492095818
Cited by
76
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
basal cell carcinoma, arborizing vessels, nodular basal cell carcinoma, superficial basal cell carcinoma, pigmented basal cell carcinoma, differential diagnosis, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Retrospective Studies, Skin Neoplasms, Dermoscopy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review