Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ELICITING RISK AND TIME PREFERENCES USING FIELD EXPERIMENTS: SOME METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES

Open access
Harrison, Glenn W., Lau, Morten Igel, Rutström, Elisabet E., Sullivan, Melonie B.·2005·Research in Experimental Economics

Abstract

We design experiments to jointly elicit risk and time preferences for the adult Danish population. The experimental procedures build on laboratory experiments that have used traditional subject pools. The field experiments utilize field sampling designs that we developed, and procedures that were chosen to be relatively transparent in the field with non-standard subject pools. Our overall design was also intended to be a general template for such field experiments in other countries. We examine the characterization of risk over a wider domain for each subject than previous experiments, allowing more precise estimates of risk attitudes. We also examine individual discount rates over six time horizons, as the first stage in a panel experiment in which we revisit subjects to test consistency and stability of responses over time. Risk and time preferences are heterogeneous, varying by observable individual characteristics. On a methodological level, we implement a refinement of existing procedures which elicits much more precise estimates, and also mitigates framing effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0193-2306(04)10005-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rutström, E. E., & Sullivan, M. B.
Venue
Research in Experimental Economics
Published
2005-03-26
Pages
125-218
ISSN
0193-2306 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580397922
Cited by
174
References
4
FWCI
34.88
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ELICITING RISK AND TIME PREFERENCES USING FIELD EXPERIMENTS: SOME METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0193-2306(04)10005-7
The paper
Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., Rutström, E. E., & Sullivan, M. B. (2005). ELICITING RISK AND TIME PREFERENCES USING FIELD EXPERIMENTS: SOME METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES. Research in Experimental Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0193-2306(04)10005-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.