Cited by 133Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentPsychology of Development and Education

Child development and classroom teaching: a review of the literature and implications for educating teachers

Daniels, Denise H, Shumow, Lee·2003·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0193-3973(02)00139-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daniels, D. H., & Shumow, L.
Affiliations
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Daniels, Denise H
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
495-526
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998574177
Cited by
133
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
child development, teacher professional development, teacher beliefs, teaching practice, cognitive development, social development (developmental psychology), teacher role, teacher education curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review