EVOLUTION AND SOCIAL ANXIETY
Abstract
If human social anxiety is not predominately about the fear of physical injury or attack, as it is in other animals, then, to understand human social anxiety (i.e., fear of evaluation), it is necessary to consider why certain types of relationships are so important. Why do humans need to court the good feelings of others and fear not doing so? And why, when people wish to appear attractive to others (e.g., to make friends, date a desired sexual partner, or give a good presentation), do some people become so overwhelmed with anxiety that they behave submissively and fearfully (which can be seen as unattractive) or are avoidant? This article has suggested that humans have evolved to compete for attractiveness to make good impressions because these are related to eliciting important social resources and investments from others. These, in turn, have been linked to inclusive fitness and have physiological regulating effects. Being allocated a low social rank or ostracized carries many negative consequences for controlling social resources and physiological regulation. Social anxiety, like shame, can be adaptive to the extent that it helps people to "stay on track" with what is socially acceptable and what is not and could result in social sanction and exclusion. However, dysfunctional social anxiety is the result of activation of basic defensive mechanisms (and modules for) for threat detection and response (e.g., inhibition, eye-gaze avoidance, flight, or submission) that can be…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to ranking theory, social comparison is a mechanism through which individuals gather information about their position in the social hierarchy.
“According to ranking theory, social comparisons is a mechanism through which individuals gather information about their position in the social hierarchy (Gilbert, 2001).”
From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 2001
The damage limitation strategy involves displaying more submissive behavior, lowering self-confidence, reducing social exploration, and using nonverbal cues of submission, such as gaze avoidance.
“This strategy involves displaying more submissive behavior, lowering self-confidence, reducing social exploration, and using nonverbal cues of submission, such as gaze avoidance (Gilbert, 2001).”
From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 136 · Cited by 370
- Authors
- Gilbert, P.
- Corresponding author
- Gilbert, Paul
- ORCID
- Gilbert, Paul
- Venue
- Psychiatric Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 723-751
- ISSN
- 0193-953X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053912232
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- social anxiety, evolutionary psychology, evaluation apprehension, social attractiveness, social rank, ostracism, inclusive fitness, submission, avoidance, threat detection, defense mechanisms, shame, social exclusion, social prestige
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Awareness, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Desirability, Social Dominance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review