The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system
Open accessAbstract
Clinicians require a reliable and valid method of evaluating facial function after facial nerve injury. This tool should be clinically relevant and easy to administer, provide a quantitative score for reporting purposes, and be sensitive enough to detect clinically important change over time or with treatment. The proposed facial grading system has all essential information, including precise definitions for each item, presented on one page. The facial grading system is based on the evaluation of resting symmetry, degree of voluntary excursion of facial muscles, and degree of synkinesis associated with specified voluntary movement. Different regions of the face are examined separately with the use of five standard expressions. All items are evaluated on point scales, and a cumulative composite score is tabulated. Construct validity was addressed by comparing the proposed facial grading system to prerehabilitation and postrehabilitation treatment scores of 19 patients with varying degrees of facial nerve injury. All patients had documented change in a controlled study of feedback training. The proposed system reports results in a more continuous manner with a wider response range than the House-Brackmann grades. Each component of the grading system is sensitive to change and individually contributes to a change in the composite score. Tests of interrater reliability are currently near completion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feinstein, A. R. (1987) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1xp3vbc · Cited by 538
Cited by
Early Treatment with Prednisolone or Acyclovir in Bell's Palsy
Sullivan, F. M., Swan, I. R. C., Donnan, P. T., Morrison, J. M., Smith, B. H., McKinstry, B., Davenport, R. J., Vale, L. D., Clarkson, J. E., Hammersley, V., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072006 · Cited by 771
Validation of a Patient‐Graded Instrument for Facial Nerve Paralysis: The FaCE Scale
Kahn, J. B., Gliklich, R. E., Boyev, K. P., Stewart, M. G., Metson, R. B., & McKenna, M. J. (2001) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-200103000-00005 · Cited by 386
Bell's palsy: aetiology, clinical features and multidisciplinary care
Eviston, T. J., Croxson, G. R., Kennedy, P. G. E., Hadlock, T., & Krishnan, A. V. (2015) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-309563 · Cited by 317
The psychosocial impact of facial palsy: A systematic review
Hotton, M., Huggons, E., Hamlet, C., Shore, D., Johnson, D., Norris, J. H., Kilcoyne, S., & Dalton, L. (2020) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12440 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- ROSS, B., FRADET, G., & NEDZELSKI, J.
- Venue
- Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 380-386
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- OpenAlex
- W2036824495
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0194-5998(96)70206-1
- The paper
- ROSS, B., FRADET, G., & NEDZELSKI, J. (1996). Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(96)70206-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.