Experimental cervical spine injury model: evaluation of airway management and splinting techniques
Abstract
We evaluated airway management maneuvers and the effects of cervical splinting on a model of an injured spinal column. X-ray films of a fresh cadaver verified a normal cervical spine. C5-C6 instability was created surgically and documented radiologically with flexion and extension maneuvers. Basic and advanced airway techniques were performed and were documented radiologically. The procedures were then repeated using different types of splinting. Chin lift, jaw thrust, esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and endotracheal intubation can cause extension, widening, and/or anterior subluxation. A two-piece, semirigid soft cervical collar may minimize flexion but not extension of the spine. With the Velcro in back, soft collars minimize flexion; with Velcro in front, they minimize extension. Standard nonsurgical airway management techniques appear to aggravate preexisting injuries. The soft collar and semirigid collar do little to prevent movement, and their presence may serve only as a warning to physicians that a neck injury may be present.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The primary benefit of a rigid cervical collar is to serve as a reminder about the potential existence of an unstable c-spine injury.
“the primary benefit of a rigid cervical collar is to serve as a reminder about the potential existence of an unstable c-spine injury.”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [53]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aprahamian, C., Thompson, B. M., Finger, W. A., & Darinz, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Venue
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 584-587
- ISSN
- 0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057641848
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Keywords
- cervical spine injury, airway management, cervical collar, jaw thrust, esophageal obturator airway, endotracheal intubation, spinal subluxation
- MeSH terms
- Cervical Vertebrae, Joint Dislocations, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Models, Biological, Neck, Radiography, Splints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review