Cited by 176Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Comparison of treatment of supraventricular tachycardia by Valsalva maneuver and carotid sinus massage

Lim, SH, Anantharaman, V, Teo, WS, Goh, PP, Tan, ATH·1998·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objective To compare the efficacy of the Valsalva maneuver with that of carotid sinus massage (CSM) in terminating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in the ED.Methods This prospective, randomized case study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care institution. Patients were at least 10 years of age with regular narrow complex tachycardia and had an ECG diagnosis of SVT. Patients with regular narrow complex tachycardia were randomly assigned to undergo either the Valsalva maneuver or CSM. If the tachycardia was not terminated by the method chosen by randomization, then the alternative method of vagal maneuver was used. If the tachycardia was not converted by both methods of vagal stimulation, patients would undergo either synchronized electrical cardioversion or a pharmacologic method of conversion at the discretion of the treating physician, depending on the patient's hemodynamic status.Results One hundred forty-eight instances of SVT were studied. Sixty-two patients underwent Valsalva maneuver first with conversion in 12 (success rate of 19.4%). Eighty-six underwent CSM first with conversion in 9 (success rate 10.5%). Carotid sinus massage was used in the 50 cases of SVT in which conversion was not achieved with the Valsalva maneuver. Conversion occurred in 7 cases (success rate 14.0%). For the 77 cases of SVT in which initial CSM did not achieve conversion, conversion occurred in 13 with the Valsalva maneuver (success rate 16.9%). The Valsalva maneuver and CSM achieved conversion in a total of 41 instances of SVT (success rate 27.7%).Conclusion Vagal maneuvers are efficacious in terminating about one quarter of spontaneous SVT cases. There is no detectable difference in efficacy between the Valsalva maneuver and CSM. [Lim SH, Anantharaman V, Teo WS, Goh PP, Tan ATH: Comparison of treatment of supraventricular tachycardia by Valsalva maneuver and carotid sinus massage. Ann Emerg Med January 1998;31:30-35.].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70277-x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, S., Anantharaman, V, Teo, W., Goh, P., & Tan, A.
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
30-35
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067245155
Cited by
176
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
supraventricular tachycardia, Valsalva maneuver, carotid sinus massage, vagal maneuvers, narrow complex tachycardia, emergency department management, electrical cardioversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review