Cited by 55Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Alterations in β-amyloid production and deposition in brain regions of two transgenic models

Lehman, Emily J.H, Kulnane, Laura Shapiro, Lamb, Bruce T·2003·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene are associated with altered production and deposition of amyloid beta (Abeta) peptide in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. The pathways that regulate APP processing, Abeta production and Abeta deposition in different tissues and brain regions remain unclear. To address this, we examined levels of various APP processing products as well as Abeta deposition in a genomic-based (R1.40) and a cDNA-based (Tg2576) transgenic mouse model of AD. In tissues, only brain generated detectable levels of the penultimate precursor to Abeta, APP C-terminal fragment-beta. In brain regions, holoAPP levels remained constant, but ratios of APP C-terminal fragments and levels of Abeta differed significantly. Surprisingly, cortex had the lowest steady-state levels of Abeta compared to other brain regions. Comparison of Abeta deposition in Tg2576 and R1.40 animals revealed that R1.40 exhibited more abundant deposition in cortex while Tg2576 exhibited extensive deposition in the hippocampus. Our results suggest that AD transgenic models are not equal; their unique characteristics must be considered when studying AD pathogenesis and therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00153-7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehman, E. J. H., Kulnane, L. S., & Lamb, B. T.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
Lamb, Bruce T
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
645-653
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164829288
Cited by
55
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG14451, AG-08012, P50AG008012)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 43703, P30CA043703)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-08613, T32GM008613)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, amyloid precursor protein, Alzheimer's disease, APP processing, transgenic mouse model, Tg2576 mice, regional brain differences, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, APP mutations
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Ear, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Eye, Female, Kidney, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Olfactory Bulb, Pancreas, Peptide Fragments, Species Specificity, Testis, Tissue Distribution, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review