Cited by 54Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Effects of refeeding by cyclic enteral nutrition on body composition: comparative study of elderly and younger patients

Hébuterne, X., Schneider, S., Peroux, J.-L., Rampal, P.·1997·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Previous reports suggest that correcting the malnourished state may be more difficult in elderly people than in younger people. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of 21 days of cyclic enteral nutrition (CyEN) on nutritional and body composition parameters in elderly, compared with younger patients. Twenty-four patients younger than 65 years (mean age 50 years) and 26 patients 65 years of age and older (mean age 75 years) referred for refeeding, having lost at least 20% of their body weight or at least 10% in 3 months, were studied. All patients were ambulatory. Cyclic enteral nutrition was administered nocturnally via a nasogastric tube; in the daytime patients were allowed to eat normally and to walk. Resting energy expenditure was measured at day 0 by indirect calorimetry. Ten anthropometric and biological nutritional parameters and a global nutritional deficiency (GND) were measured at day 0 and 21. Body composition was measured at day 0 and 21 by bioelectric impedance analysis. Total energy intakes were 286% and 280% of resting energy expenditure in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Body weight, serum prealbumin, serum transferrin, 24 h urinary creatinine, and the GND (39.9% vs 23.3%; P < 0.01) improved significantly more in younger than in elderly patients. Fat free mass (3.9 vs 2.4 kg; P < 0.05) and body cell mass (2.7 vs 1.6 kg; P < 0.01) but not fat mass improved significantly more in younger than in elderly patients. In conclusion, 21 days refeeding by cycl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0261-5614(97)80013-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older malnourished patients need a higher energy supply than younger adults to gain weight, and the increase in body weight and fat-free mass in response to equal energy supply is slower in older patients.

    “Furthermore, older malnourished patients need a higher energy supply than younger adults to gain weight, and the increase in BW and fat-free mass in response to equal energy supply is slower in older patients (126).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hébuterne, X., Schneider, S., Peroux, J.-L., & Rampal, P.
Affiliations
Hôpital l'Archet (FR)
Corresponding author
Hébuterne, X.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
283-289
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992658792
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
refeeding, body composition, malnutrition, elderly patients, fat-free mass, body cell mass, fat mass, prealbumin, transferrin, urinary creatinine, energy expenditure, weight loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review