Cited by 96Peripheral Nerve DisordersCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyNerve Injury and Rehabilitation

Outcome Study of Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow Treated with Simple Decompression and an Early Programme of Physical Therapy

NATHAN, P. A., KENISTON, R. C., MEADOWS, K. D.·1995·Journal of Hand Surgery

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb. This paper presents the experience of treating cubital tunnel syndrome with simple decompression in 131 patients (164 ulnar nerves) over the past 12 years. 85% of these patients had mild or moderate ulnar nerve disease. In 146/164 ulnar nerves (89%), simple decompression resulted in good or excellent immediate post-operative relief of symptoms. After an average follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 0.8–12.0 years), 130/164 (79%) still reported good or excellent relief. The independent predictors of a better long-term outcome were absence of post-operative subluxation, greater body weight, normal pre-operative two-point discrimination (2-PD), and a more recent date of operation. A physical therapy rehabilitation program generally began on the day after surgery. Active participation in this predicted a rapid return to work or activities of daily living. The average time to return to work with simple decompression was 20 workdays.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80125-1

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between the number of logins and outcomes in e-therapies targeting physical health is similar to the positive relationship observed between session attendance and outcome in physical rehabilitation and to the dose-response curve seen in medication therapy.

    “The association between the number of logins and outcomes in e-therapies targeting physical health is similar to the positive relationship observed between session attendance and outcome in physical rehabilitation [67-70] and to the dose–response curve seen in medication therapy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NATHAN, P. A., KENISTON, R. C., & MEADOWS, K. D.
Affiliations
From the Portland Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
Venue
Journal of Hand Surgery
Published
1995-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
628-637
ISSN
0266-7681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020708331
Cited by
96
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Keywords
cubital tunnel syndrome, ulnar nerve compression, ulnar nerve decompression, nerve entrapment, physiotherapy rehabilitation, two-point discrimination, long-term outcomes, return to work, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Elbow, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Ulnar Nerve Compression Syndromes, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review