The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the critical load of the osteoligamentous cervical spine in frontal plane. DESIGN: Whole human cervical spine specimens were loaded in axial compression with increasing force until the point of buckling. BACKGROUND: The osteoligamentous cervical spine and the surrounding muscles support the weight of the head and the external loads applied to it. Critical load is the maximum compressive force that the spinal column can sustain before buckling. Critical loads have been obtained for the osteoligamentous thoracolumbar spine (without the rib cage) and the lumbar spine. Critical load of the cervical spine has not yet been determined. METHODS: When a compressive force is applied to the cervical spine, it bends in the sagittal plane producing greater lordosis. The determination of critical load in Euler's sense requires blocking of this sagittal plane bending. A special apparatus was developed that constrained such bending in the sagittal plane, but allowed complete freedom of the spine motion in the frontal plane. Experiments were conducted to determine the axial force-lateral bending curves of whole cervical spine specimens. Critical load values were obtained from these curves. As an alternative to this method, bending stiffness in the frontal plane was experimentally determined and the critical load was computed using Euler's theory of columns. RESULTS: Based upon the study of seven spine specimens (CO-T1), the critical load for the human cervical spine was found to be 10.5 (3.8) N obtained by direct experimentation. The average critical load calculated with the Euler theory using bending stiffness data, was 11.9 (2.0), but there were large individual differences when compared with the experimental results. CONCLUSIONS: The critical load of the osteoligamentous human cervical spine is about one-fifth to one-quarter the weight of the average head.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain
Falla, D. (2004) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2004.05.003 · Cited by 320
Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes
Jull, G., Falla, D., Treleaven, J., Hodges, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2007) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20220 · Cited by 310
Geere, J.-A. L., Hunter, P. R., & Jagals, P. (2010) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-9-52 · Cited by 182
Nightingale, R. W., Winkelstein, B. A., Knaub, K. E., Richardson, W. J., Luck, J. F., & Myers, B. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00037-4 · Cited by 171
Geere, J.-A., Bartram, J., Bates, L., Danquah, L., Evans, B., Fisher, M. B., Groce, N., Majuru, B., Mokoena, M. M., Mukhola, M. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.08.010406 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Panjabi, M. M., Cholewicki, J., Nibu, K., Grauer, J., Babat, L. B., & Dvorak, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995452545
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0268-0033(97)00057-0
- The paper
- Panjabi, M. M., Cholewicki, J., Nibu, K., Grauer, J., Babat, L. B., & Dvorak, J. (1998). Critical load of the human cervical spine: an in vitro experimental study. Clinical Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(97)00057-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.