Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes

Open access
Jull, Gwendolen, Falla, Deborah, Treleaven, Julia, Hodges, Paul, Vicenzino, Bill·2007·Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Abstract

This study compared the effects of conventional proprioceptive training and craniocervical flexion (C‐CF) training on cervical joint position error (JPE) in people with persistent neck pain. The aim was to evaluate whether proprioceptive training was superior in improving proprioceptive acuity compared to another form of exercise, which has been shown to be effective in reducing neck pain. This may help to differentiate the mechanisms of effect of such interventions. Sixty‐four female subjects with persistent neck pain and deficits in JPE were randomized into two exercise groups: proprioceptive training or C‐CF training. Exercise regimes were conducted over a 6‐week period, and all patients received personal instruction by an experienced physiotherapist once per week. A significant pre‐ to postintervention decrease in JPE, neck pain intensity, and perceived disability was identified for both the proprioceptive training group (p < 0.001) and the C‐CF training group (p < 0.05). Patients who participated in the proprioceptive training demonstrated a greater reduction in JPE from right rotation compared to the C‐CF training group (p < 0.05). No other significant differences were observed between the two groups. The results demonstrated that both proprioceptive training and C‐CF training have a demonstrable benefit on impaired cervical JPE in people with neck pain, with marginally more benefit gained from proprioceptive training. The results suggest that improved proprioceptive acuity following intervention with either exercise protocol may occur through an improved quality of cervical afferent input or by addressing input through direct training of relocation sense. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jor.20220

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Jull, G., Falla, D., Treleaven, J., Hodges, P., & Vicenzino, B.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
404-412
ISSN
  • 0736-0266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-527X
OpenAlex
W1971064818
Cited by
310
References
33
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jor.20220
The paper
Jull, G., Falla, D., Treleaven, J., Hodges, P., & Vicenzino, B. (2007). Retraining cervical joint position sense: The effect of two exercise regimes. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20220

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.