Cited by 67Selenium in Biological SystemsHeavy metals in environmentChromium effects and bioremediation

Evaluation of Atriplex lines for selenium accumulation, salt tolerance and suitability for a key agricultural insect pest

Vickerman, D.B, Shannon, M.C, Bañuelos, G.S, Grieve, C.M, Trumble, J.T·2002·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Thirty Atriplex lines were examined for potential habitat improvement and phytoremediation of selenium (Se) contaminated sites. Studies were conducted to determine the biomass production, Se accumulation, and resistance of each line to the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, an agriculturally important insect. Plants were tested using three salinity treatments: (1) control, no Se; (2) NaCl and CaCl2 salts and 1 mg l(-1) Se (12.7 microM) added as sodium selenate; and (3) iso-osmotic to treatment 2 containing high concentrations of sulfate and I mg l(-1) Se added as sodium selenate. Insect bioassays measured survival, growth, and development. Atriplex patula. A. spongiosa 415862, A. hortensis, A. hortensis 379088 and A. hortensis 379092 were among the top biomass producers and Se accumulators, yet they exhibited significantly reduced insect growth, development, and survival. High background sulfate strongly reduced Se accumulation, suggesting that phytoremediation potential is greatest in saline areas having low to moderate sulfate levels. However, these lines grew well in high salinity soils, indicating possible use as a self-seeding cover crop to improve habitat. All plant lines grown in control and high sulfate salinity treatments are acceptable oviposition sites for S. exigua, indicating that these plants would help reduce populations of this key agricultural pest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00116-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is ample evidence that Se protects plants from herbivory.

    “There is ample evidence to indicate that Se protects plants from herbivory [208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216]”
  • The protective effects of Se have been found not only for hyperaccumulators but also for other plants at lower Se concentrations.

    “The protective effects of Se have been found not only for hyperaccumulators but also for other plants at lower Se concentrations [208,216].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vickerman, D. B., Shannon, M. C., Bañuelos, G. S., Grieve, C. M., & Trumble, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • U.S. Salinity Laboratory (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Vickerman, D.B
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
463-473
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118367832
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Selenium in Biological Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
Keywords
Atriplex, selenium accumulation, salt tolerance, phytoremediation, Spodoptera exigua, sulfate, biomass production, cover crops, selenium-contaminated soil, oviposition sites
MeSH terms
Animals, Biodegradation, Environmental, Biological Assay, Pest Control, Biological, Selenium, Soil Pollutants, Species Specificity, Spodoptera, Waste Management, Atriplex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review