Cited by 27Food composition and propertiesDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseDiabetes Management and Research

Controlling subjects’ prior diet and activities does not reduce within-subject variation of postprandial glycemic responses to foods

Campbell, Janice E., Glowczewski, Thomas, Wolever, Thomas M.S.·2003·Nutrition Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0271-5317(03)00017-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Campbell et al. 2003, smokers returned similar glycaemic response and variability under controlled and uncontrolled conditions.

    “Participants who were smokers (three out of thirteen) reported 'craving' during the controlled tests, but nevertheless returned similar values for glycaemic response and variability under the two conditions.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003

  • In Campbell et al. 2003, mean glycaemic response did not differ between controlled and uncontrolled tests.

    “There was no effect on mean values of glycaemic response.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003

  • In Campbell et al. 2003, variability of glycaemic response was no greater in uncontrolled tests than in controlled tests and tended to be lower.

    “In contrast to expectations, the variability of results was no greater in the 'uncontrolled' tests and in fact tended to be lower.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003

  • In Campbell et al. 2003, vigorous physical activity before uncontrolled tests did not significantly affect glycaemic response, though there was a tendency to lower blood glucose at 90 min.

    “Vigorous physical activity on the day before the 'uncontrolled' tests did not produce a significant effect, although there was a tendency to lower blood glucose concentrations at 90 min.”

    From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, J. E., Glowczewski, T., & Wolever, T. M. S.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Wolever, Thomas M.S.
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
621-629
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988183465
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
postprandial glycemic response, within-person variability, blood glucose, breakfast, physical activity limitation, coefficient of variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review