Controlling subjects’ prior diet and activities does not reduce within-subject variation of postprandial glycemic responses to foods
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Campbell et al. 2003, smokers returned similar glycaemic response and variability under controlled and uncontrolled conditions.
“Participants who were smokers (three out of thirteen) reported 'craving' during the controlled tests, but nevertheless returned similar values for glycaemic response and variability under the two conditions.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003
In Campbell et al. 2003, mean glycaemic response did not differ between controlled and uncontrolled tests.
“There was no effect on mean values of glycaemic response.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003
In Campbell et al. 2003, variability of glycaemic response was no greater in uncontrolled tests than in controlled tests and tended to be lower.
“In contrast to expectations, the variability of results was no greater in the 'uncontrolled' tests and in fact tended to be lower.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003
In Campbell et al. 2003, vigorous physical activity before uncontrolled tests did not significantly affect glycaemic response, though there was a tendency to lower blood glucose at 90 min.
“Vigorous physical activity on the day before the 'uncontrolled' tests did not produce a significant effect, although there was a tendency to lower blood glucose concentrations at 90 min.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Campbell et al. 2003
Cites
The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications
Wolever, T., Jenkins, D., Jenkins, A., & Josse, R. (1991) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.846 · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Self-citationSurwit, R. S., Schneider, M. S., & Feinglos, M. N. (1992) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.15.10.1413 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K. N., Gibbs, A. L., Lang, V., Slama, G., & Wolever, T. M. S. (2005) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr2005100 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
Self-citationWolever, T. M., Zurbau, A., Koecher, K., & Au-Yeung, F. (2024) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.07.011 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Campbell, J. E., Glowczewski, T., & Wolever, T. M. S.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wolever, Thomas M.S.
- Venue
- Nutrition Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-629
- ISSN
- 0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988183465
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Toronto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- postprandial glycemic response, within-person variability, blood glucose, breakfast, physical activity limitation, coefficient of variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review