Cited by 401Spatial Cognition and NavigationUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisPlace Attachment and Urban Studies

Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition

Couclelis, H., Golledge, R.G., Gale, N., Tobler, W.·1987·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-4944(87)80020-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Landmarks are important for spatial learning because they serve as anchors and reference points that help wayfinders orient themselves, navigate beyond immediate surroundings, and structure mental representation of space.

    “It is already well-established that landmarks are important for spatial learning because they serve as anchors and reference points that help wayfinders easily orient themselves in the surrounding environment, navigate to a destination beyond their immediate surroundings, and structure their mental representation of space (Couclelis et al., 1987; Golledge, 1999; Montello, 2005).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 401

Authors
Couclelis, H., Golledge, R. G., Gale, N., & Tobler, W.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
99-122
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039039191
Cited by
401
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Keywords
spatial cognition, cognitive maps, cognitive space, salient cues, regionalization, hierarchy, cognitive configuration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review