The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies revisited
Abstract
While our field has done commendable work putting forward new ideas in operations strategy, we have historically done a less effective job validating concepts after their introduction. Given this issue, we attempted to test and extend one of the most influential OM configurations — Miller and Roth’s [Management Science 40 (1994) 285] taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Their taxonomy was longitudinally replicated with a newer set of North America Manufacturing Futures data as well as an entirely different global sample. Our replications partially supported Miller and Roth’s taxonomy of three strategy‐types (Caretakers, Marketeers, and Innovators), but found no evidence of the two underlying dimensions of manufacturing strategy that they called market scope and differentiation. Interestingly, the Marketeers were replaced in the 1990s by a new strategy called Designers, and three other unique manufacturing strategies were identified in the global data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
Cited by
Backshoring strategy and the adoption of Industry 4.0: Evidence from Europe
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & Mascali, F. (2019) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.003 · Cited by 248
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2019-0209 · Cited by 97
Supply and Operations: Parallel paths and Integrated Strategies
Brown, S., & Cousins, P. D. (2004) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00421.x · Cited by 25
Pozo, H., Roque da Silva, O., & Tachizawa, T. (2017) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2017.1405718 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Frohlich, M. T., & Dixon, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08-22
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 541-558
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2040976453
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
