The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Forecasting the returns of reusable containers
Abstract
Executive Summary: A number of organizations sell products in containers that can be reused. Illustrative cases include beverages (in kegs, plastic cartons, etc.) and liquid gases (in cylinders). The time from issue to return of an individual container is usually not known with certainty and there is a chance that the container is never returned (because of loss or irreparable damage). In such a situation, even if the demand pattern is known and level with time, it is still necessary to acquire new containers from time to time. Such an acquisition must be initiated when the inventory level of containers drops too low in relation to the anticipated net demand (demand minus returns) during the replenishment lead time. Thus, it is important to forecast the net demand as well as to obtain an estimate of the accuracy of the forecast. In this paper, four different forecasting procedures, based upon different amounts of information, are developed. The information possibilities include recent issues period by period and recent returns (either individually identified or on an aggregate basis). The methods are compared on a wide range of simulated data, including some cases based on empirical data obtained from industry. Not surprisingly, the use of additional information improves the performance. However, most of the benefit associated with using the costly approach of identifying and tracking the issues and returns of individual containers is achieved by the more practical method of recording only aggregate issues and aggregate returns period by period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review
Srivastava, S. K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · Cited by 3,984
Ilgin, M. A., & Gupta, S. M. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037 · Cited by 1,015
Network design for reverse logistics☆
SRIVASTAVA, S. (2008) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.11.012 · Cited by 623
A closed-loop logistics model for remanufacturing
Jayaraman, V, Guide, V. D. R., & Srivastava, R. (1999) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600716 · Cited by 537
The Potential for Cannibalization of New Products Sales by Remanufactured Products*
Guide, Jr., & Li, J. (2010) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00280.x · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelle, P., & Silver, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-35
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2053500992
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forecasting the returns of reusable containers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(89)80003-8
- The paper
- Kelle, P., & Silver, E. A. (1989). Forecasting the returns of reusable containers. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(89)80003-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.