The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes
Abstract
As firms continue to focus on core competencies and outsource non‐core products and services to external suppliers, supply chain management is increasingly viewed as a source of competitive advantage. However, if the supply chain is to be a source of competitive advantage, suppliers' performance must be managed and developed to meet the needs of the buying firm. In an exploratory study based on data collected from 84 companies, the authors develop a process model for supplier development. Using this process model as a framework, the authors then compare two approaches buying firms use in supplier development: (1) reactive efforts to increase the performance of laggard suppliers, and (2) strategic efforts to increase the capabilities of the supply base to enhance the buying firm's long‐term competitive advantage. Strategic efforts were found to significantly increase the buying company's involvement in suppliers' processes, and required greater dedication of resources, personnel and communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
The antecedents of buying firms' efforts to improve suppliers
Krause, D. R. (1999) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00038-2 · Cited by 494
Self-citationZimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340 · Cited by 445
Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00343.x · Cited by 438
Self-citatione‐Integration in the Supply Chain: Barriers and Performance*
Frohlich, M. T. (2002) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01655.x · Cited by 382
BUYER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: DERIVED VALUE OVER TWO DECADES
TERPEND, R., TYLER, B. B., KRAUSE, D. R., & HANDFIELD, R. B. (2008) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00053.x · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-58
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1964890053
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00030-8
- The paper
- Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1998). An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00030-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.