CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 489Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in the sexual revictimization of women

Messman-Moore, Terri L, Long, Patricia J·2003·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00203-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is now widespread empirical evidence that child sexual abuse (CSA) survivors are at greater risk for sexual revictimization in adulthood, but less is known of the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Despite the lack of a conceptual framework to guide research, there has been a recent influx of studies examining explanatory variables, with most focusing on the psychological sequelae of CSA: alcohol and drug use, sexual behavior, dissociation, posttraumatic symptomatology, poor risk recognition, and interpersonal difficulties. With the exception of sexual behavior, the studies reviewed here provide limited or mixed support for the role of intrapersonal factors in revictimization. Future research may benefit from a focus on the function of psychological distress that is expressed as psychological vulnerability, as opposed to individual forms of psychopathology or maladaptive behavior. An ecological framework may be useful as a guide to future investigations, as this model focuses on factors outside of the victim, including childhood factors such as family environment, contextual factors including the behavior of the perpetrator, and societal and cultural factors that impact revictimization. Future investigations should focus on the interaction between victim vulnerability and perpetrator behavior. Implications for prevention programming, clinical intervention, and future research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00203-9

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 116 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 489

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Messman-Moore, T. L., & Long, P. J.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
537-571
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00203-9
OpenAlex
W1710978354
Cited by
484
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 31
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
child sexual abuse, sexual revictimization, women, psychological sequelae, victim vulnerability, perpetrator behavior, ecological model, posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation, risk identification, alcohol and drug use, sexual behavior, prevention programming
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Cultural Characteristics, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Social Conditions, Survivors, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review