CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revictimization rates and method variance

Roodman, Allison A., Clum, George A.·2001·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00045-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present meta-analytic review examined revictimization rates and sources of variance among rates provided by 19 empirical studies of adult females. In this review, revictimization refers to the occurrence of at least one incident of childhood sexual abuse followed by a subsequent incident of adult sexual victimization. Studies were included in the review if they provided rates of revictimization and had a comparison sample of nonrevictimized women. The overall effect size for revictimization was .59, a moderate effect, suggesting a definite relationship between childhood victimization and adult victimization experiences. The overall effect size was heterogeneous and various study characteristics and definition issues were examined to determine their effect on revictimization rates. The most striking, although not surprising finding, was that studies in which more inclusive definitions of abuse were utilized yielded smaller effect sizes than studies that used more restrictive definitions of abuse. Studies that examine victimization or revictimization are often concerned with learning more about the phenomenon with the expectation that by understanding the underlying mechanism, prevention and treatment can be better focused. The interpretation given to results from past and future studies should take into account those factors found to influence estimations of revictimization rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00045-8

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ames, 1990, Childhood abuse, learned helplessness and risky lifestyle, Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 2764
  2. Brenner, 1995, The adult patterns of men and women who were sexually abused as children, Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 3468
  3. Keane, 1993, Abuse as a child as a predictor of victimization as an adult (Masters thesis, California State University-Fullerton, 1993), Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 0345
  4. Mayall, 1992, Sexual revictimization, Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 5984
  5. *Runtz, M. (1987). The psychosocial adjustment of women who were sexually and physically abused during childhood and early adulthood: A focus on revictimization. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Manitoba,Winnipeg, Canada.
  6. van Benschoten, 1995, The revictimization of adult women reporting a history of chlidhood sexual abuse (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, 1995), Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 3468
  7. Wills, 1992, Cognitive and interpersonal factors associated with child sexual abuse and adult revictimization (Doctoral dissertation, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, 1992), Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 0514

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–248 of 248

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Roodman, A. A., & Clum, G. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Clum, George A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
183-204
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00045-8
OpenAlex
W1812589175
Cited by
246
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
revictimization, child sexual abuse, method variance, effect size heterogeneity, definition of abuse, women, methodological bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Recurrence, Research Design, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review