The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active emmetropization ? evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice
Abstract
There is increasing evidence from animal studies in support of the concept of an active emmetropization mechanism which has potentially important clinical ramifications for the management of refractive errors. Recent research into refractive development and emmetropization is reviewed, with emphasis given to work involving the chick, tree shrew and monkey, which represent the three most widely used animal models in this field. The findings of this research are reviewed in a clinical context. Compensatory eye growth responses to focusing errors imposed by lenses represent the most compelling evidence for active emmetropization. These observations are complemented by other evidence showing recovery from induced refractive errors such as form-deprivation myopia. Of the animals listed above, chicks show the most impressive emmetropization, being able to compensate fully (using choroidal and scleral mechanisms) to lens powers ranging from +15 D to -10 D. The range of lens powers eliciting appropriate compensatory responses is narrower in the tree shrew and monkey, and the response patterns generally are also more complex to interpret. These data relate to young animals and together indicate refractive plasticity during development. Extrapolation of these findings to humans predicts that natural emmetropization will be inhibited in neonates by early intervention with prescription lenses, and that refractive correction of myopia will lead to accelerated progression. This convincing evidence for active emmetropization warrants due consideration in developing clinical management strategies for refractive errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens
Schaeffel, F., Glasser, A., & Howland, H. C. (1988) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(88)90113-7 · Cited by 689
Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks
Wildsoet, C., & Wallman, J. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00233-c · Cited by 634
Self-citationMyopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys
WIESEL, T. N., & RAVIOLA, E. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/266066a0 · Cited by 611
Moving the retina: Choroidal modulation of refractive state
Wallman, J., Wildsoet, C., Xu, A., Gottlieb, M. D., Nickla, D. L., Marran, L., Krebs, W., & Christensen, A. M. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)e0049-q · Cited by 587
Self-citationExtreme Myopia Produced by Modest Change in Early Visual Experience
Wallman, J., Turkel, J., & Trachtman, J. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.694514 · Cited by 558
Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur.
Gwiazda, J. E., Thorn, F., Bauer, J. A., & Held, R. M. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 530
Local Retinal Regions Control Local Eye Growth and Myopia
Wallman, J., Gottlieb, M. D., Rajaram, V., & Fugate-Wentzek, L. A. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3603011 · Cited by 515
Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys
Hung, L.-F., Crawford, M. L. J., & Smith, E. L. (1995) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0895-761 · Cited by 463
Wallman, J., & I. Adams, J. (1987) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(87)90027-7 · Cited by 396
Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye
Irving, E. L., Sivak, J. G., & CALLENDER, M. G. (1992) · Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics · doi:10.1016/0275-5408(92)90175-v · Cited by 324
Cited by
Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia
McBrien, N. (2003) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(02)00063-0 · Cited by 616
Summers Rada, J. A., Shelton, S., & Norton, T. T. (2006) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.08.009 · Cited by 566
The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys
Smith III, E. L., & Hung, L.-F. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00229-6 · Cited by 403
Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: Differential responses to short and long wavelengths
Rucker, F. J., & Wallman, J. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.003 · Cited by 99
Myopia and peripheral ocular aberrations
Mathur, A., Atchison, D. A., & Charman, W. N. (2009) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/9.10.15 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Wildsoet, C. F.
- Venue
- Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 279-290
- ISSN
- 0275-5408 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002786570
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active emmetropization ? evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0275-5408(97)00003-3
- The paper
- Wildsoet, C. F. (1997). Active emmetropization ? evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0275-5408(97)00003-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.