Cited by 251Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry

Open access
May, Carl, Gask, Linda, Atkinson, Theresa, Ellis, Nicola, Mair, Frances, Esmail, Aneez·2001·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

New telecommunications technologies promise to profoundly change the spatial and temporal relationship between health professional and patient. This paper reports results from an ethnographic study of the introduction of a videophone or 'telemedicine' system intended to facilitate faster and more convenient referral of patients with anxiety and depression in primary care, to a community mental health team. We explore the reasons for contest over the telemedicine system in practice, contrasting professionals' critique of the technology in play with a more fundamental problem: the extent to which the telecommunications system threatened deeply embedded professional constructs about the nature and practice of therapeutic relationships.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00305-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Measurement-based care (MBC) shows promise of resulting in higher remission and recovery rates than does care as usual.

    “MBC shows promise of resulting in higher remission and recovery rates than does care as usual. 537,610”
  • Previous studies have described the challenges brought by the new 'work' and scrutiny associated with such interventions, and the disruption of normalised everyday practices and interactions regarding management has been recognised as a major barrier to the integration of e-health interventions into routine care and management.

    “Previous studies have described the challenges brought by the new ‘work’ and scrutiny associated with such interventions [12,38,39] and where the disruption of normalised everyday practices and interactions regarding management have been recognised a major barrier to the integration of e-health interventions into routine care and management [13,40,41].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Baer, 1997, Telepsychiatry at forty, Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 5, 7, 10.3109/10673229709034720 · DOI
  2. Binkhuysen, 1995, Remote expert consultation for MRI procedures by means of teleradiology, European Journal of Radiology, 19, 147, 10.1016/0720-048X(94)00573-U · DOI
  3. Bloomfield, 1994, Boundary disputes, Information Technology and People, 7, 9, 10.1108/09593849410074007 · DOI
  4. Brecht, 1996, The University of Texas Medical Branch-Texas Department of Criminal Justice telemedicine project, Telemedicine Journal, 2, 25, 10.1089/tmj.1.1996.2.25 · DOI
  5. Collins, 1998, Resisting a diagnostic technique, Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 1, 10.1111/1467-9566.00078 · DOI
  6. Doolittle, 1997, Practising oncology via telemedicine, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 3, 63, 10.1258/1357633971930869 · DOI
  7. Dowrick, 1997, Rethinking the doctor-patient relationship in general practice, Health and Social Care in the Community, 5, 11, 10.1111/j.1365-2524.1997.tb00089.x · DOI
  8. Doze, 1999, Evaluation of a telepsychiatry pilot project, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 5, 38, 10.1258/1357633991932379 · DOI
  9. Gammon, 1998, Psychotherapy supervision conducted by videoconferencing, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 4, 33, 10.1258/1357633981931353 · DOI
  10. Gask, 1997, Evaluating models of working at the interface between mental health services and primary care, British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 6, 10.1192/bjp.170.1.6 · DOI
  11. Gilmour, 1998, Comparison of teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations, British Journal of Dermatology, 139, 81, 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02318.x · DOI
  12. Hodgkin, 1996, Medicine, postmodernism and the end of certainty, British Medical Journal, 313, 1568, 10.1136/bmj.313.7072.1568 · DOI
  13. Hyer, 1995, Telemedical experiences at an Antarctic station, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 5, 335
  14. Jewson, 1976, The disappearance of the sick man from medical cosmology 1770-1870, Sociology, 10, 225, 10.1177/003803857601000202 · DOI
  15. Lambrecht, 1997, Telemedicine in trauma care, Telemedicine Journal, 3, 265, 10.1089/tmj.1.1997.3.265 · DOI
  16. Latimer, J. (1987) Socializing disease: medical categories and the inclusion of the aged. Sociological Review. in press.
  17. Mair, 1997, Interpersonal and organizational issues in telemedicine, Health and Social Care in the Community, 5, 5
  18. May, 1992, Individual care? Power and subjectivity in therapeutic relationships, Sociology, 26, 589, 10.1177/0038038592026004003 · DOI
  19. Peck, 1998, Mental health in the NHS, Journal of Mental Health, 7, 241, 10.1080/09638239818076 · DOI
  20. Pilgrim, 1998, User involvement in mental health service development, Journal of Mental Health, 7, 95, 10.1080/09638239818373 · DOI
  21. Prout, 1996, Actor-network theory, technology and medical sociology, Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 98, 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10934726 · DOI
  22. Ruggiero, 1998, Teleradiology, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 4, 25, 10.1258/1357633981931245 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
May, C., Gask, L., Atkinson, T., Ellis, N., Mair, F., & Esmail, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
May, Carl
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-06
Volume
52
Issue
12
Pages
1889-1901
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101646744
Cited by
251
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Health Service Executive
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
telepsychiatry, telemedicine, videoconferencing, technology adoption in clinical practice, therapeutic relationship, primary care referral, anxiety, depression, community mental health services
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Depressive Disorder, Diffusion of Innovation, Family Practice, United Kingdom, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Physician-Patient Relations, Pilot Projects, Psychiatry, Telecommunications, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review