Cited by 314Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research

Open access
Richardson, Lisa K., Frueh, B. Christopher, Grubaugh, Anouk L., Egede, Leonard, Elhai, Jon D.·2009·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

The provision of mental health services via videoconferencing tele-mental health has become an increasingly routine component of mental health service delivery throughout the world. Emphasizing the research literature since 2003, we examine: 1) the extent to which the field of tele-mental health has advanced the research agenda previously suggested; and 2) implications for tele-mental health care delivery for special clinical populations. Previous findings have demonstrated that tele-mental health services are satisfactory to patients, improve outcomes, and are probably cost effective. In the very small number of randomized controlled studies that have been conducted to date, tele-mental health has demonstrated equivalent efficacy compared to face-to-face care in a variety of clinical settings and with specific patient populations. However, methodologically flawed or limited research studies are the norm, and thus the research agenda for tele-mental health has not been fully maximized. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01170.x

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hilty DM Liu W Marks S Callahan EJ 2003 The effectiveness of telepsychiatry: A review Canadian Psychiatric AssociationBulletin 35 10 17
  2. Institute of Medicine 2004 Quality through collaboration: The future of rural mental health Committee on the Future of Rural Health Care Washington, DC National Acadamies Press
  3. Morland LA Frueh BC Pierce K Miyahara S 2003 PTSD and tele-mental health: Updates and future directions National Center for PTSD Clinical Quarterly 12 1 5
  4. Vega WA Pollitt A Mays RA Jr 2007 Reply to Hispanics and telepsychiatry Psychiatric Services 58 878 17535953

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, L. K., Frueh, B. C., Grubaugh, A. L., Egede, L., & Elhai, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of South Dakota (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2009-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
323-338
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2048357365
Cited by
314
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH074468)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
telemental health, videoconferencing, telemedicine, mental health service delivery, research agenda, randomized controlled trials, treatment efficacy, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, methodological limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review