The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solutions forgone? How health professionals frame the problem of postnatal depression
Abstract
Our interest is in how particular solutions in postnatal depression have a tendency to be adopted at the expense of alternative solutions. One aspect of the answer may lie in how people in positions of authority think about problems. 'Framing' refers to the way particular causalities, consequences and moralities are contained within the ways in which people communicate concepts, in particular in language and in metaphor. Naming the way problems are framed and identifying alternative frames, (i.e., 'reframing') may provide an opportunity to set problems more effectively and to identify solutions that will solve the problem more effectively. A framing analysis was conducted, drawing on interviews with senior researchers, policy makers and practitioners in the field of postnatal depression. Seven principal ways in which the problem of postnatal depression was framed were illuminated. These fitted into three broad approaches to the problem: individual therapeutic approaches, social competence approaches and societal approaches. Participants in our study were comfortable and articulate in describing the problem of postnatal depression-whether they were focused on the individual or societal levels of analysis. However, they were less well versed and comfortable in discussing what they felt might be important social or societal-level solutions, lacking in both language and schema to do so. The history and hierarchy that is carried by people from the helping professions may be hinder…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One Australian study by Lloyd and Hawe (2003) uses Entman's analytical heuristic to identify how a variety of health professionals, including nurses, frame the problem of post-natal depression.”
From Grounded theory: a methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism (2007) · cites this paper as Lloyd and Hawe 2003
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,850
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,326
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 10,570
An ecological perspective on health promotion programs
McLeroy, K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz, K. (1988) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818801500401 · Cited by 8,502
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116
Szasz, T. (1979) · Biomedical Ethics and the Law · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6561-1_9 · Cited by 2,645
EDITORIAL: Postpartum depression and child development
Murray, L., & Cooper, P. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291796004564 · Cited by 971
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Lumley, 2000, Authors’ reply to Professor Bland, British Medical Journal, 321, 1470
- New South Wales Health. (1994). Postnatal depression services review (pp. 94–131). Sydney: NSW Health Department, State Health Publication no. (PA).
- Philips, 1991, Prospective study of postpartum depression, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 151, 10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.151 · DOI
- Pope, S. (2000). Postnatal depression: A systematic review of published scientific literature to 1999: An information paper. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.
- Powell, 2001, Qualitative research may be more appropriate, British Medical Journal, 322, 928
- Small, 2001, Authors’ reply about debriefing women after operative childbirth, British Medical Journal, 322, 928
- Stallard, 2001, Research methodology was inadequate, British Medical Journal, 322, 928
- Wearing, 1994, The health professions, psychiatric discourse, and the classification of mental illness, Australian Journal of Communication, 21, 53
Cited by
Chew-Graham, C. A., Sharp, D., Chamberlain, E., Folkes, L., & Turner, K. M. (2009) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-10-7 · Cited by 125
Grounded theory: a methodological spiral from positivism to postmodernism
Mills, J., Chapman, Y., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2007) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04228.x · Cited by 109
Chew-Graham, C., Chamberlain, E., Turner, K., Folkes, L., Caulfield, L., & Sharp, D. (2008) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp08x277212 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Lloyd, B., & Hawe, P.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1783-1795
- ISSN
- 0277-9536
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 32
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.